Ex parte DEILY et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1998-1824                                                        
          Application No. 08/463,383                                                  


               Claim 16, the sole independent claim on appeal, is                     
          specifically drawn to a method for manufacturing a neck flange              
          having a neck engaging portion of a flexible material and an                
          interconnection of a less flexible material and sets forth                  
          particular steps.                                                           


               As indicated above, it is manifestly clear to us that                  
          claim 16 expressly addresses the method of manufacturing “a                 
          neck flange”.  Read in light of the underlying disclosure                   
          (pages 1 and 3), a neck flange is readily understood to be a                
          particular article of manufacture that secures, positions, and              
          supports a tracheostomy tube to a patient’s neck and provides               
          comfort and adjustability.                                                  


               With the above understanding of the claimed subject                    
          matter in mind, we turn now to the evidence that the examiner               
          relies upon in support of the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103.              


               The patent to Linne explicitly discloses a process (Figs.              
          3 and 4) for forming a unitary seal (Fig. 2).  It is at once                
          clear to us, from a reading of this reference, that it does                 
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007