The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 12 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KIRK D. PRALL and GURTEJ S. SANDHU ____________ Appeal No. 1998-1850 Application No. 08/596,613 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KRASS, FLEMING, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-6, 8-18, 22-24, 40-42, 44, and 45, which are all the claims remaining in the application. We affirm-in-part, and enter a new ground of rejection in accordance with 37 CFR § 1.196(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007