Ex parte CHEUNG et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1998-1902                                                                                       
              Application No. 08/435,592                                                                                 

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The disclosed invention is directed to a method for diffusing quantization error that               
              is inherent in converting a continuous tone (gray scale) scan to binary values.  The binary                
              values represent what is to be printed by a printer as black dots, and what is not to be                   
              printed (i.e., leaving white space).  The printer cannot print shades of gray, so the error                
              diffusion filter enables simulation of the scanned continuous image using the binary printed               
              output.  Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                                                      
                     1.     An error diffusion method for halftoning a digital image formed of an array of               
                     scan lines of pixels, each pixel having a gray value, for forming an output image                   
                     including:                                                                                          
                            scanning each line of image pixels in a processing direction from one end of                 
                     the scan line to the other;                                                                         
                            determining the gray value of each image pixel; and                                          
                            error diffusing each of the image pixels by using an error diffusion filter                  
                     having weights of 8 - 0 - 4 - 4 expressed in clockwise sequence from the origin.                    
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                    
              Barton                             5,313,287                           May 17, 1994                        
              Eschbach et al.  (Eschbach)        5,317,653                           May 31, 1994                        
                     Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                      
              Barton and “the well known prior art.”                                                                     
                     Claims 3-12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                         
              Barton, “the well known prior art,” and Eschbach.                                                          


                                                           -2-                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007