Ex parte ZIGADLO et al. - Page 6




              Appeal No. 1998-1905                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/362,725                                                                                  

              the order of the signals is sufficient to meet the broad requirements of the “signal                        
              processing circuit” of instant claim 1.                                                                     
                     Thus, we find the only difference between instant claim 1 and the disclosure of                      
              Rantasuo to be that Rantasuo discloses a single infrared color filter element that performs                 
              the associated function set forth in claim 1, and which is positioned over the image                        
              sensing elements of the solid state image sensor, rather than a plurality of such elements.                 
              Absent suggestion in either of Rantasuo or Dillon to make such a modification, however,                     
              the references before us do not establish a prima facie case of obviousness for the subject                 
              matter as a whole of instant claim 1.                                                                       




















                                                     CONCLUSION                                                           

                                                           -6-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007