The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JUN FUJIKAMI, KENICHI SATO, TSUKUSHI HARA and
HIDEO ISHII
____________
Appeal No. 1998-1917
Application No. 08/766,984
____________
HEARD: Jan. 25, 2001
____________
Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO and GROSS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1, 3-7, and 9-15, which are the only claims
remaining in the application. Claims 2 and 8 have been
canceled.
The claimed invention relates to an insulated oxide
superconducting cable in which a plurality of tape-shaped
multifilamentary superconducting wires are spirally wound in
superposed layers on a support structure former. A tape-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007