Ex parte WOO - Page 2




         Appeal No. 1998-2003                                                      
         Application No. 08/440,246                                                


         processing of said information and an output connected to provide a       
         representation of said position-of-the-receiver on a display, the         
         improvement comprising:                                                   
              a database of maps stored in a portable document format (PDF)        
         file independent of any hardware, software and operating system used      
         to create the database for providing for a description of documents       
         including any combination of text, graphics and images in a device-       
         independent and resolution-independent format connected to output         
         selected ones of said maps on said display.                               
              The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner       
         in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                     
         Steiner et al. (Steiner)      5,528,248          Jun. 18, 1996            
                                                (filed Aug. 19, 1994)              
         Adobe Systems Inc., Portable Document Format Reference Manual, 1993,      
         Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. (Adobe)                                     
              Claims 1, 4, 5, and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as        
         being unpatentable over Steiner in view of Adobe.                         
              Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 11,            
         mailed February 9, 1998) for the examiner's complete reasoning in         
         support of the rejection, and to appellant's Brief (Paper No. 10,         
         filed March 17, 1997) for appellant's arguments thereagainst.             
                                     OPINION                                       
              We have carefully considered the claims, the applied prior art       
         references, and the respective positions articulated by appellant and     



                                        2                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007