Ex parte HERMANS et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-2217                                                        
          Application No. 08/644,555                                                  


          Claim 1. A method for making a bulky tissue sheet comprising:               
          (a) depositing an aqueous suspension of papermaking fibers                  
          onto a forming fabric to form a wet tissue web, said                        
          papermaking fibers comprising at least about 10 dry weight                  
          percent modified wet-resilient fibers selected from the group               
          consisting of chemically cross-linked cellulose fibers, heat-               
          cured cellulosic fibers, mercerized fibers and sulfonated pulp              
          fibers; (b) partially dewatering the wet web to a consistency               
          of about 15 percent or greater; (c) compressing the partially               
          dewatered web in a high intensity extended nip press to                     
          further dewater the web to a consistency of about 35 percent                
          or greater; and (d) final drying the web, wherein the Bulk of               
          the dewatered web prior to final drying is greater than (-                  
          0.02C + 3.11), wherein "C" is the consistency of the web                    
          leaving the high intensity extended nip press, expressed as                 
          percent dryness, and Bulk is expressed as cubic centimeters                 
          per gram.                                                                   
               The references relied upon by the examiner are:                        
          Weldon              4,551,199           Nov. 05, 1985                       
          Klowak              4,849,054           Jul. 18, 1989                       
          Steiner et al.           5,393,384           Feb. 28, 1995                  
          Bluhm et al.        5,556,511           Sep. 17, 1996                       
          Schauman       GB 1,212,473             Nov. 18, 1970                       
          (Published Great Britain Application)                                       
               The following rejections are at issue in this appeal:                  
               (1) Claims 1-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                  
          being unpatentable over Bluhm.                                              
               (2) Claims 1-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                  
          being unpatentable over Steiner in view of Bluhm and GB '473,               
          Klowak or Weldon.                                                           



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007