Appeal No. 1998-2229 Application 08/491,663 THE REJECTION Claims 1-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Gunstone in view of Milo and List. OPINION We reverse the aforementioned rejection. We need to address only claim 1, which is the sole independent claim. The examiner relies upon Gunstone for the following disclosures: stick margarine having a minimum of 80% fat (page 147), various combinations of fat products for use in stick margarines (page 153), solids/fat indexes of stick margarines (page 154), interesterification, direct blending of natural fats, and combining fat and water phases as an emulsion (page 153), pumping the emulsion into a hold tank which feeds Votator A and then B units (page 153), and tempering the product (pages 153-54) (answer, pages 5-6). The examiner argues that Gunstone differs from the appellants’ claimed stick product in that Gunstone does not disclose processing fats in a C-unit and does not disclose a fat containing less than 10% trans fatty acid (answer, pages -4-4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007