Ex parte BROUILLET - Page 4




              Appeal No. 1998-2297                                                                                       
              Application 08/353,622                                                                                     


                     Thomas discloses “an acidic microemulsion that can be                                               
              sprayed onto the surface to be cleaned, and wiped off without                                              
              usual rinsing, and still will leave the cleaned surface bright                                             
              and shiny” (col. 1, lines 11-14).                                                                          




                     The appellant’s claim 1 recites that a pad having thereon                                           
              an abrasive, acidic composition is affixed to a portable,                                                  
              power tool which is rotated at high speed until the glass                                                  
              surface is clean.  During patent prosecution, claims are to be                                             
              given their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with                                             
              the specification, as the claim language would have been read                                              
              by one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the                                                         
              specification and prior art.  See In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319,                                               
              321, 13 USPQ2d 1320, 1322 (Fed. Cir. 1989); In re Sneed, 710                                               
              F.2d 1544, 1548, 218 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1983); In re                                                 
              Herz, 537 F.2d 549, 551, 190 USPQ 461, 463 (CCPA 1976); In re                                              
              Okuzawa, 537 F.2d 545, 548, 190 USPQ 464, 466 (CCPA 1976); In                                              
              re Kroekel, 504 F.2d 1143, 1146, 183 USPQ 610, 612 (CCPA                                                   
              1974); In re Moore, 439 F.2d 1232, 1235, 169 USPQ 236, 238-39                                              

                                                          -4-4                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007