Appeal No. 1998-2349
Application 08/586,874
facts and not on unsupported generalities.” In re Freed, 425
F.2d 785, 787, 165 USPQ 570, 571 (CCPA 1970). In my opinion,
based on the current record, there is an insufficient factual
basis to support a prima facie case of obviousness over
Takatomi. Furthermore, Wilson does not remedy the deficiency.
Accordingly, I would not sustain any of the examiner’s
rejections.
) BOARD OF PATENT
)
CATHERINE TIMM ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
INTERFERENCES
WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK
2033 K STREET, N.W., SUITE 800
WASHINGTON, DC 20006
15
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007