Appeal No. 1998-2475 Page 4
Application No. 08/505,020
Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced
by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted
rejections, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper
No. 7, mailed June 10, 1997) and the examiner's answer (Paper
No. 12, mailed January 13, 1998) for the examiner's complete
reasoning in support of the rejections, and to appellant's
brief (Paper No. 11, filed November 21, 1997) for appellant's
arguments thereagainst.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have
carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the
rejections advanced by the examiner, and the evidence of
obviousness relied upon by
the examiner as support for the rejections. We have,
likewise, reviewed and taken into consideration, in reaching
our decision, the appellant's arguments set forth in the brief
along with the examiner's rationale in support of the
rejections and arguments in rebuttal set forth in the
examiner's answer.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007