Appeal No. 1998-2483
Application No. 08/289,347
Therefore, the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness of
the invention as recited in the language of claim 10, and we cannot sustain the rejection of
claim 10.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 10 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) is reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH L. DIXON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
jld/vsh
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007