Appeal No. 1998-2513
Application No. 08/171,427
CONCLUSION
Appellant has shown the rejection of dependent claims 9 and 14 to be erroneous,
but has not shown reversible error in the rejection of claims 1-3, 5-8, 10-13, or 15.
Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1-3, 5-8, 10-13, and 15 is affirmed, but the rejection of
claims 9 and 14 is reversed. The examiner’s decision in rejecting claims 1-3 and 5-15 is
thus affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may
be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PARSHOTAM S. LALL ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-10-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007