Ex parte ISHII et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1998-2518                                                        
          Application No. 08/442,835                                                  


          information that identifies a beginning location of a program               
          recorded on the recording medium.                                           
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Kosaka                        3,671,665                Jun. 20,             
          1972                                                                        
          Lewis et al. (Lewis)          4,224,644                Sep. 23,             
          1980                                                                        
          Strubbe et al. (Strubbe)           5,047,867                Sep.            
          10, 1991                                                                    
               Claims 6, 8, and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as being unpatentable over Kosaka in view of Lewis and                      
          Strubbe.                                                                    
               Reference is made to the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 12,              
          mailed February 12, 1997) for the examiner's complete                       
          reasoning in support of the rejections, and to appellant's                  
          Brief (Paper No. 11, filed January 9, 1997)  for appellant's1                                
          arguments thereagainst.                                                     
                                       OPINION                                        
               We have carefully considered the claims, the applied                   
          prior art references, and the respective positions articulated              


               We note that a Reply Brief was filed April 14, 1997 (Paper No. 13)1                                                                     
          and denied entry by the examiner.  Accordingly, we will not consider the    
          arguments made therein in rendering our decision.                           
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007