Appeal No. 1998-2588 Application No. 08/673,702 In our judgment, the examiner’s rejection is improperly based on hindsight reconstruction with the benefit of appellants’ disclosure of the invention, rather than on any suggestion in Cameron’s disclosure. Accordingly, the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness, and the rejection of claims 1 through 19 as unpatentable over Cameron is reversed. REVERSED William F. Smith ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT Fred E. McKelvey ) Senior Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) Toni R. Scheiner ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007