The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ARNOLD SCHOOLMAN ____________ Appeal No. 1998-2656 Application No. 08/523,535 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 9 through 15. Claim 14 was amended subsequent to the final rejection. These claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the application. Appellant's invention addresses an anesthesia apparatus. A basic understanding of the invention can be gained from aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007