Appeal No. 1998-2656
Application No. 08/523,535
perspective of the knowledge in the art of anesthesia
apparatus at the time of appellant's invention, as reflected,
for example, in the underlying specification (pages 2 through
5 and page 12, line 15 through page 12, line 3) viewed in
conjunction with other prior art, such as the Wells and Healy
patents.
In summary, this panel of the board has not sustained the
rejections on appeal, and has remanded the application to the
examiner.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007