The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SATOSHI ITAMI, KAZUO NAKASHIMA, and KENICHI UTSUMI ____________ Appeal No. 1998-2658 Application No. 08/507,981 ____________ Heard: January 23, 2001 ____________ Before THOMAS, Hecker, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3, 5-10, and 12, which are all of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND The appellants’ invention relates to a software processing apparatus. Specifically, an apparatus is provided for writing software to a medium, or reading software from a medium, only if identification information in the software corresponds to identification information stored in a userPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007