Ex parte ITAMI et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 1998-2658                                       Page 7           
          Application No. 08/507,981                                                  


          Itami et al. is a merchandising system for computer software                
          which tracks the customer’s ID, which verifies the                          
          volume/serial/label number on a medium before unloading data                
          to it, and which verifies the storage capacity of the medium.”              
          However, the appellants maintain (brief, pages 13 and 14) that              
               Orbach, all purchased information is accessible to the                 
               user/customer.  In Itami et al., there is a user                       
               accessible area and a user inaccessible area on optical                
               disk.  There is not, however, any teaching of placing the              
               data in the user accessible area into the inaccessible                 
               area on the optical disk.                                              
               The examiner asserts (answer, page 4), inter alia, that                
          Orbach teaches,                                                             
                    first information reading means for reading a first               
               identification information (col. 3 lines 50-54, reading                
               name or title of customer’s program selection);                        
                    second information reading means for reading a                    
               second identification information contained in software                
               (col. 4 lines 39-44, reading name of selected software or              
               selected program on disk after customer selected the                   
               program);                                                              
          The examiner acknowledges (answer, page 5) that “Orbach does                
          not explicitly teach reading the first identification                       
          information stored in an area to which a user is inhibited                  
          from accessing on a medium.”  To overcome the deficiencies of               
          Orbach, the examiner turns to IBM and Itami.  According to the              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007