The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TADASHI OHTANI, YOSHIKAZU IIDA,
HIROYUKI ISURU, DAIKI TSUKAHARA, RIICHI HIGAKI
and YUKIKAZU IWANE
__________
Appeal No. 1998-2720
Application 08/352,730
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 3, which
constitute all the claims remaining in the application. An
amendment after final rejection was filed on June 20, 1997 and
was entered by the examiner.
The disclosed invention pertains to a device which
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007