Appeal No. 1998-2740
Application 08/438,492
appellant. Therefore, we do not agree with appellant that Seki
does not teach the creation of a sample program and then editing
the geometric parameters of a work piece to create a new robot
movement using conversion formulas as claimed.
Since we find that Seki automatically calculates teaching
point positions and robot movement programs based on the edited
parameters and prestored conversion formulas, we are not
persuaded that the examiner has erred in making the rejection of
claims 1-7. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting
claims 1-7 is affirmed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007