Ex parte HAAS et al. - Page 1





          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                    publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.            

                                                          Paper No. 31                

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      
              Ex parte HAROLD ROBERT HAAS, SCOTT CRAIG LEGGETT, SR.,                  
                   RANDALL CADE GOODMAN and JOHN IRVING MATHIS                        
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1998-2890                                  
                             Application No. 08/811,142                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                 
          through 10, all of the claims pending in this application.1                 


               Appellants' invention pertains to a transportable shelter              
          facility for housing equipment to be protected, to a method of              

          1 Claim 5 and claim 7 were amended subsequent to the final1                                                                          
          rejection.                                                                  
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007