Appeal No. 1998-2890
Application No. 08/811,142
examiner.4 As a consequence of our review, we make the
determinations which follow.
We cannot sustain the examiner's rejection of appellants'
claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 based upon "Prior Art" Figs. 1
and 2.
Independent claim 1 addresses a transportable shelter
facility for housing equipment to be protected, with the shelter
facility comprising, inter alia, a support base having a first
length and comprising a shelter support portion and a power
source support portion, with the power source support portion
being outward beyond the shelter support portion upon the support
base.
Independent claim 5 is drawn to a method of constructing a
transportable shelter facility comprising, inter alia, the steps
4 Since, as specified below, we have reversed the examiner's
respective rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), we need not
assess the commercial success showing in the respective
declarations of Brent Womack (Paper No. 15) and Harold R. Haas
(Paper No. 24).
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007