The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RAZIEL HAIMI-COHEN and ADAM V. REED
____________
Appeal No. 1998-2974
Application No. 08/524,106
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, GROSS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 14, 15, 17 through 19, 21, 22, and 24
through 27, which are all of the claims pending in this
application. The rejection of claim 15, however, does not
appear in the Examiner's Answer, nor is the secondary
reference previously used in the rejection of claim 15
included in the Examiner's Answer under the listing of the
prior art. Therefore, we assume that the rejection of claim
15 has been withdrawn. Accordingly, only claims 14, 17
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007