The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 28 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KUNITAKE MATSUSHITA, TAKAYUKI YAMAWAKI, HIROSHI SANO, and KAZUO MURAMATSU ____________ Appeal No. 1998-3026 Application No. 08/531,613 ____________ HEARD: FEBRUARY 20, 2001 ____________ Before THOMAS, LALL, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-4, which are all the claims remaining in the application. We reverse, and enter a new ground of rejection in accordance with 37 CFR § 1.196(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007