Ex parte MATSUSHITA et al. - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication                 
              in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                
                                                                                            Paper No. 28                 
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                    ____________                                                         
                           Ex parte KUNITAKE MATSUSHITA, TAKAYUKI YAMAWAKI,                                              
                                    HIROSHI SANO, and KAZUO MURAMATSU                                                    
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 1998-3026                                                     
                                              Application No. 08/531,613                                                 
                                                    ____________                                                         
                                            HEARD: FEBRUARY 20, 2001                                                     
                                                    ____________                                                         
              Before THOMAS, LALL, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
              BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  




                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final                        
              rejection of claims 1-4, which are all the claims remaining in the application.                            
                     We reverse, and enter a new ground of rejection in accordance with 37 CFR §                         
              1.196(b).                                                                                                  











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007