Ex parte HAISMA et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             

                                                            Paper No. 17              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Ex parte JAN HAISMA,                                  
                            FRANCISCUS P. WIDDERSHOVEN,                               
                                        and                                           
                                  MARNIX G. COLLET                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1998-3031                                  
                             Application No. 08/511,507                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and LALL, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges.                                                                     
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                 
          through 10.                                                                 
               The disclosed invention relates to an image processing                 
          system that enhances depth sensation of an image.                           
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007