Ex parte HAISMA et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-3031                                                        
          Application No. 08/511,507                                                  


               1.  An image processing system for processing a 2-                     
               dimensional input image to create a 2-dimensional                      
               output image with enhanced depth sensation;                            
               characterized:                                                         
               - an identificator operative to select, according to a                 
               predetermined criterion, at least one area being a                     
          portion of the input image;                                                 
               - a processor operative to create the output image by                  
                    changing a property of the area relative to a                     
          corresponding       property of a complement of the area in the             
          input image, wherein the output image is geometrically                      
          substantially       undistorted with regard to the input image.             

               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Jackson                       4,875,097                Oct. 17,             
          1989                                                                        
          Sandor et al. (Sandor)        5,113,213                May  12,             
          1992                                                                        
          Shino                         5,295,199                Mar. 15,             
          1994                                                                        
               Claims 1 through 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as being unpatentable over Sandor in view of Shino and                      
          Jackson.                                                                    
               Reference is made to the briefs and the answer for the                 
          respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               The obviousness rejection of claims 1 through 10 is                    
          reversed.                                                                   
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007