Appeal No. 1998-3055 Application No. 08/631,591 established a prima facie case of obviousness of the recited burner height. As for the staggered formation of the burners, the examiner argues, in reliance upon Japikse, that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to stagger Lauwers’ burners because doing so would not modify the operation of the device (answer, page 4). The examiner, however, has provided no explanation as to why staggering the burners would not modify the operation of the device. Again, the examiner has improperly relied upon a per se rule that shifting the location of a part is obvious. Accordingly, we conclude that the examiner has not carried the burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness of the invention recited in claim 5. Consequently, we reverse the rejection of this claim. DECISION The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-4 over Castelain, and claim 5 over Lauwers, are reversed. REVERSED TERRY J. OWENS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007