Ex parte KOBAYASHI et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-3055                                                        
          Application No. 08/631,591                                                  


          established a prima facie case of obviousness of the recited                
          burner height.  As for the staggered formation of the burners,              
          the examiner argues, in reliance upon Japikse, that it would                
          have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to stagger            
          Lauwers’ burners because doing so would not modify the operation            
          of the device (answer, page 4).  The examiner, however, has                 
          provided no explanation as to why staggering the burners would              
          not modify the operation of the device.  Again, the examiner has            
          improperly relied upon a per se rule that shifting the location             
          of a part is obvious.                                                       
               Accordingly, we conclude that the examiner has not carried             
          the burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness of             
          the invention recited in claim 5.  Consequently, we reverse the             
          rejection of this claim.                                                    
                                       DECISION                                       
               The rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-4 over                
          Castelain, and claim 5 over Lauwers, are reversed.                          
                                       REVERSED                                       


                         TERRY J. OWENS                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007