Ex parte WAMPRECHT et al. - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         

                                                               Paper No. 16           

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    ____________                                      

                            Ex parte CHRISTIAN WAMPRECHT                              
                                 and MICHAEL SONNTAG                                  
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1998-3113                                  
                             Application No. 08/583,167                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      

          Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN, and TIMM, Administrative Patent                    
          Judges.                                                                     
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of               
          claims 1-3.  Claims 4 and 5, which are the only other claims                
          remaining in the application, stand withdrawn from                          
          consideration by the examiner as being directed toward a                    
          nonelected invention.                                                       







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007