Ex parte WAMPRECHT et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-3113                                                        
          Application No. 08/583,167                                                  


          37 CFR § 1.196(b).                                                          
                                      DECISION                                        
               The rejection of claims 1-3 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over                 
          Wamprecht in view of Nodelman is affirmed.  This affirmance is              
          denominated as involving a new ground of rejection under 37                 
          CFR § 1.196(b).                                                             
               This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant              
          to 37 CFR § 1.196(b) (amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final              
          rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53,131, 53,197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203              
          Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)).                 
          37 CFR                                                                      
          § 1.196(b) provides, "[a] new ground of rejection shall not be              
          considered final for purposes of judicial review."                          
               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                    
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              
          one of the following two options with respect to the new                    
          ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37                 
          CFR § 1.197(c) as to the rejected claims:                                   
               (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the                             
               claims so rejected or a showing of facts relating to                   
               the claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                   
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner . . . .                   
                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007