Ex parte POTH - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1998-3128                                       Page 8           
          Application No. 08/624,874                                                  


          disseminate manufacturing data to, and to collect data from,                
          many MCU's (see FIG. 1)."  Col. 3, ll. 12-14.  Because the                  
          MCUs transfer data to the intermediate computer and host, the               
          units necessarily include the claimed "means for storing a                  
          file of information to be transferred to said central                       
          computer" and the computers must necessarily include the                    
          claimed "means for requesting an information transfer between               
          said central computer and one of said controllers."                         


               The use of addressing in computer and control systems to               
          select between controllers and other devices attached to a bus              
          was old and well known in the art.  Because the reference                   
          teaches the plural MCUs on the bus, Austin's computers must                 
          necessarily include the claimed "means for selectively                      
          addressing each of said controllers ...."                                   




               Second, the appellant argues, "the MCU 9 lacks a multi-                
          tasking feature, which feature is positively recited in claim               
          1."  (Appeal Br. at 11.)  “Generally, ... the preamble does                 
          not limit the claims.”  DeGeorge v. Bernier, 768 F.2d 1318,                 







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007