Appeal No. 1998-3147 Application 08/564,304 place in a solvent, acetone and methyl ethyl ketone being particularly suitable solvents, and reacting the free isocyanate groups of the intermediate with specified polyols (col. 3, line 8 - col. 4, line 21). Chandalia discloses a coating composition which is to be subsequently moisture cured and which consists essentially of at least one polyisocyanate prepolymer which is the reaction product of a polyisocyanate with an active hydrogen-containing compound which can be a polyol (col. 2, lines 53-61; col. 6, lines 37-41). The composition can contain a solvent, the disclosed suitable solvents including methyl ethyl ketone and ethoxyethyl propionate (col. 6, lines 1-17).1 The examiner argues that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to use ethoxyethyl propionate as Hille’s solvent because Chandalia teaches the equivalence of ethoxyethyl propionate and methyl ethyl ketone as solvents (answer, page 4). Hille teaches that his solvents preferably are inert to isocyanate groups (col. 4, lines 14-15; col. 7, lines 28-34). Blum is relied upon by the examiner (answer, page 3) only for a disclosure of butoxypropanol1 as recited in the appellants’ dependent claim 3. 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007