Ex parte BRETON et al. - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being                           
               entered today was not written for publication                          
               in a law journal and is not binding precedent                          
               of the Board.                                                          
                                                               Paper No. 20           


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                                                                     
                  Ex parte MARCEL P. BRETON, GUERINO G. SACRIPANTE,                   
                       HARVEY B. GOODBRAND, CAROL A. JENNINGS                         
                                 and SUSANNE BIRKEL                                   
                                                                                     
                                Appeal No. 1998-3217                                  
                             Application No. 08/536,236                               
                                                                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                                                                     
          Before KIMLIN, WARREN and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-                
          13, 16 and 20.  Claims 17-19 and 21, the other claims                       
          remaining in the present application, have been allowed by the              
          examiner.  Claim 1 is illustrative:                                         
                    1.  An ink for ink jet printing, comprising                       
          submicron-sized particles in a liquid vehicle, said particles               
                                         -1-                                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007