Appeal No. 1998-3232 Page 4
Application No. 08/738,920
Durand et al. (Durand) 4,342,853 Aug. 03,
1982
Claims 2, 4-17, 19 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Durand in view of
Kleintjens.
OPINION
The subject matter on appeal herein generally corresponds
to the subject matter previously considered by another panel
of the
Board in Appeal No. 95-1272. In Appeal No. 95-1272, the Board
affirmed the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over a combination of the same prior art
references relied on in this appeal.2
As pointed out by appellant (brief, page 2), claim 19,
which was added in a preliminary amendment in the present
continuing application, now includes claim language regarding
2See Paper No. 34 of parent application No. 07/785,172.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007