Appeal No. 1998-3281 Application 08/650,500 weight of DAPRAL GE 202, we also find the specific limitations in the dependent claims would have been obvious from the suggestion in the prior art to use DAPRAL GE 202 as a polymeric dispersant for graphite pigments (colorants) used in ink jet ink compositions. Both Ma and Matrick disclose that their ink compositions would be useful in thermal ink jet printers. Accordingly, the limitation in claim 20 of using the inks in a thermal ink jet process is also suggested by the combination of the prior art on which we rely. OTHER ISSUES In the event appellant pursues the subject matter of this application in another application, he must supply to the examiner any product information or product sheets of which he is aware or may possess which describe the proprietary products and the uses for DAPRAL's manufactured by Akzo Chemie. The examiner and appellant should determine whether or not the newly added formula for polymers defined by the structure (a) in claim 22 is adequately "described" in the original disclosure in view of thePage: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007