Ex parte SCHWARZ - Page 16




          Appeal No. 1998-3281                                                        
          Application 08/650,500                                                      


          weight of DAPRAL GE 202, we also find the specific limitations in           
          the dependent claims would have been obvious from the suggestion            
          in the prior art to use DAPRAL GE 202 as a polymeric dispersant             
          for graphite pigments (colorants) used in ink jet ink                       
          compositions.  Both Ma and Matrick disclose that their ink                  
          compositions would be useful in thermal ink jet printers.                   
          Accordingly, the limitation in claim 20 of using the inks in a              
          thermal ink jet process is also suggested by the combination of             
          the prior art on which we rely.                                             


                                    OTHER ISSUES                                      
               In the event appellant pursues the subject matter of this              
          application in another application, he must supply to the                   
          examiner any product information or product sheets of which he is           
          aware or may possess which describe the proprietary products and            
          the uses for DAPRAL's manufactured by Akzo Chemie.  The examiner            
          and appellant should determine whether or not the newly added               
          formula for polymers defined by the structure (a) in claim 22 is            
          adequately "described" in the original disclosure in view of the            















Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007