Appeal No. 1998-3339 Page 3 Application No. 08/614,459 there has been a significant change in the typical reject rate compared with the expected situation. Accordingly, action can be taken to identify the cause of the change and procedures can be put in place to correct the problems, i.e., to return the reject rate to the expected position. Claim 1, which is representative for our purposes, follows: 1. A method of carrying out reject analysis on a process, the method comprising the steps of: a) defining a set of reject classifications for products produced by the process; b) sampling data relating to rejected products obtained from the process for the defined set of reject classifications; c) defining a model of the process from the sampled data; d) applying limits to the model indicative of out-of-control conditions; e) monitoring the process for out-of-control situations; and f) taking corrective action to bring the process back into control when the applied limits have been exceeded; characterized in that the model is defined using principal component analysis in terms of thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007