Ex parte SATOH et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1998-3348                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/541,948                                                  


          respect to HDDs, the industry attempts to use the same disk                 
          drive enclosure case for   an HDD having a single disk and                  
          also for an HDD having multiple disks.                                      


               Heretofore, the difference in mechanical resonance                     
          frequencies of a single-disk HDD and a multiple-disk HDD has                
          impeded the use of a standard enclosure case for both single-               
          disk and multiple-disk HDDs.  Because the enclosure case                    
          affects the mechanical resonance frequency of an HDD, the                   
          enclosure case has only been compatible with one of the two                 
          HDDs.  Without compatibility between the enclosure case and                 
          the HDD, magnetic head stability during track following could               
          not be maintained.                                                          


               In contrast, the appellants’ invention uses an artificial              
          movement model to derive first and second mechanical resonance              
          frequency values.  The first mechanical resonance frequency is              
          associated with the coupling of the pitching mode mechanical                
          resonance frequency of a no-load spindle motor and the primary              
          mechanical resonance frequency of one disk to be loaded.  The               
          second mechanical resonance frequency is associated with the                







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007