The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHRISTINA K. LIU, JUDITH A. GOLDSTEIN, and YUNG D.
NGUYEN
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0003
Application No. 08/642,742
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, LALL, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the rejection of claims 1, 3, 5-8, 10, 12-15, 17, 19-22, 24,
and 26-29. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue in this appeal relates to
processing video data, i.e., data representing still images or
successive images representing motion video. Different video
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007