Appeal No. 1999-0003 Page 3 Application No. 08/642,742 Claims 1, which is representative for present purposes, follows: 1. A method for processing video data, the method comprising the steps of: (a) providing data encoded in a first high level encoding format that lies hierarchically above a low level format; (b) partially decoding the data to provide data encoded in an interim level encoding format that lies hierarchically above the low level format and hierarchically below both the first high level encoding format and a second high level format, wherein the second high level format lies hierarchically above the low level format and is different from the first high level encoding format; and (c) encoding the partially decoded data in accordance with the second high level encoding format. The prior art applied in rejecting the claims follows: Loizides et al. (Loizides) 3,603,937 Sep. 7, 1971 Naimpally 5,589,993 Dec. 31, 1996 (filed Nov. 14, 1994) Ackland et al. (Ackland) 5,220,325 June 15, 1993.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007