Appeal No. 1999-0041
Application 08/475,669
double word reflecting said data when said
data's particular endian type is found not to be the
same as that of said task; and
accessing said data.
The prior art applied in rejecting the claims follows:
Undy et al. (Undy), A Low Cost Graphics and Multimedia
Workstation Chip Set, IEEE Micro, Apr. 1994, pp. 10-22
James, Multiplexed Buses: The Endian Wars Continue,
IEEE Micro, June 1990, pp. 9-21.
Claims 2-5, 18, and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being obvious over Undy in view of James. Rather than
reiterate
the arguments of the appellants or examiner in toto, we refer
the reader to the brief and answer for the respective details
thereof.
OPINION
In deciding this appeal, we considered the subject matter
on appeal and the rejection of the examiner. Furthermore, we
duly considered the arguments and evidence of the appellants
and examiner. After considering the record, we are persuaded
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007