Appeal No. 1999-0089 Page 11
Application No. 08/454,076
inter-frame prediction encoding and frame-based orthogonal
transformation ....” Therefore, we affirm the rejection of
claims 39 and 41 as obvious over Krause.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the rejection of claims 18, 38, 40, and 42
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Krause is reversed.
The rejection of claims 39 and 41 under § 103(a) as obvious
over Krause, however, is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
LANCE LEONARD BARRY )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007