Appeal No. 1999-0097 Application No. 08/532,976 cyclohexane ring," it is well settled that the burden of demonstrating unexpected results rests upon the party asserting them. In re Klosak, 455 F.2d 1077, 1080, 173 USPQ 14, 16 (CCPA 1972). Furthermore, appellants have not established on this record that the specification results would be considered truly unexpected by one of ordinary skill in the art. In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 1099, 231 USPQ 375, 381 (Fed. Cir. 1986). In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the examiner's decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED EDWARD C. KIMLIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) -8-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007