Ex parte MATSUURA et al. - Page 3




         Appeal No. 1999-0139                                                        
         Application No. 08/542,576                                                  


         1989                                                                        
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                    
              Claims 1-12 stand rejected as follows: under 35 U.S.C.                 
         § 102(b) as anticipated by or, in the alternative under 35                  
         U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Pashby, and under 35 U.S.C. § 103              
         as obvious over Pashby in view of Newman.                                   


                                       OPINION                                       
              We reverse the aforementioned rejections.                              
                         Rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                          
              In order for a claimed invention to be anticipated under               
         35 U.S.C. § 102(b), all of the elements of the claim must be                
         found in one reference.  See Scripps Clinic & Research Found.               
         v. Genentech Inc., 927 F.2d 1565, 1576, 18 USPQ2d 1001, 1010                
         (Fed. Cir. 1991).                                                           
              Pashby discloses a method for making a semiconductor                   
         package wherein a semiconductor chip is bonded to a lead frame              
         by an adhesive member comprised of a heat resistant film                    
         having an adhesive coating on both of its sides, and a molding              
         compound covers the semiconductor chip and a bonded part                    


                                         3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007