Ex parte HAYAMA et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1999-0163                                                        
          Application No. 08/745,698                                                  


               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Sloan et al. (Sloan)          5,146,067                Sep. 08,             
          1992                                                                        
          Takaaki et al. (Takaaki)      EP        0 473 147 A2        Mar.            
          04, 1992                                                                    
          (published European Patent application)                                     
          Hewlett-Packard, Your Guide to Setting Up Your LaserJet III                 
          Printer, pp. 1-3 (1990).                                                    
               Claims 4 and 6-8 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 103 as being unpatentable over Sloan in view of Takaaki and               
          Hewlett-Packard.  In a separate rejection, claims 4 and 6-8                 
          stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                       
          unpatentable over  Takaaki in view of Hewlett-Packard.                      
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the              
          Examiner, reference is made to the Brief (Paper No. 26) and                 
          Answer (Paper No. 27) for the respective details.                           
                                      OPINION                                         
               We have carefully considered the subject matter on                     
          appeal, the rejections advanced by the Examiner and the                     
          evidence                                                                    
          of obviousness relied upon by the Examiner as support for the               
          rejections.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into                     
          consideration, in reaching our decision, Appellants’                        
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007