Appeal No. 1999-0163 Application No. 08/745,698 The Examiner relies on the following prior art: Sloan et al. (Sloan) 5,146,067 Sep. 08, 1992 Takaaki et al. (Takaaki) EP 0 473 147 A2 Mar. 04, 1992 (published European Patent application) Hewlett-Packard, Your Guide to Setting Up Your LaserJet III Printer, pp. 1-3 (1990). Claims 4 and 6-8 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Sloan in view of Takaaki and Hewlett-Packard. In a separate rejection, claims 4 and 6-8 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Takaaki in view of Hewlett-Packard. Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the Examiner, reference is made to the Brief (Paper No. 26) and Answer (Paper No. 27) for the respective details. OPINION We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejections advanced by the Examiner and the evidence of obviousness relied upon by the Examiner as support for the rejections. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into consideration, in reaching our decision, Appellants’ 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007