Ex parte ANDERSON et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1999-0216                                                        
          Application No. 08/526,197                                                  



               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Axmear et al. (Axmear)        4,549,232                Oct. 22,             
                                                                 1985                 
          Volz et al. (Volz)            5,185,681                Feb. 09,             
                                                                 1993                 
          Fujiwara                 JP 1-220101              Sep. 01, 1989             
          (Published Japanese Kokai Patent Application)1                              
          R. L. Comstock and T. A. Schwarz (Schwarz), “Triple-Layer                   
          Magnetic Recording Track Following Servo Concept With                       
          Alternating Single-Frequency Servo Tracks,” 16 IBM Technical                
          Disclosure Bulletin, No. 6, pp. 1821-23 (November 1973).2                   
               Claims 1 and 4-7 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C.                
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Axmear.  Claims 2, 3, and 8-               
          10 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence               
          of obviousness, the Examiner offers Axmear in view of Fujiwara              
          and Volz with respect to claims 2, 8, and 9, Axmear in view of              
          Schwarz with respect to claim 3, and Axmear alone with respect              
          to claim 10.                                                                
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the              
          Examiner, reference is made to the Brief (Paper No. 18)  and3                    

               1A copy of a translation provided April 2001 by the U.S. Patent        
          & Trademark Office is enclosed with this decision.                          
               2Since the Examiner has referred to this reference by using the second 
          listed author’s name, Schwarz, we will do so also for consistency.          
               3A Reply Brief filed by Appellants on August 1, 1997, deemed by the    
          Examiner (communication dated August 13, 1997, Paper No. 21) as not being   
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007