Ex parte ANDERSON et al. - Page 8




            Appeal No. 1999-0216                                                                         
            Application No. 08/526,197                                                                   


            actually described by Axmear.                                                                
                  In view of the above discussion, since all of the claim                                
            limitations are not present in the disclosure of Axmear, the                                 
            Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of independent claims                                
            1 and 7, as well as claims 4-6 dependent thereon, is not                                     
            sustained.                                                                                   


























                                                   8                                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007