Appeal No. 1999-0216 Application No. 08/526,197 actually described by Axmear. In view of the above discussion, since all of the claim limitations are not present in the disclosure of Axmear, the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of independent claims 1 and 7, as well as claims 4-6 dependent thereon, is not sustained. 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007