The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 24 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte KAZUYA KOBAYASHI, TAKASHI YAMATE, and MOTOH ASAKURA ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0349 Application No. 08/621,379 ____________ HEARD: JANUARY 11, 2001 ____________ Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 2-20 , which are all 1 of the claims pending in this application. BACKGROUND 1 Claims 5 and 15 were cancelled in an amendment filed under 37 CFR 1.116 (Paper No. 11B, filed April 23, 1998). The amendment was entered for purposes of appeal by the examiner in a subsequent advisory action (Paper No. 12, mailed May 7, 1998). Claims 2-4, 6-14, and 16-20 remain before us for decision on appeal.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007