Ex parte KOBAYASHI et al. - Page 1




                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                                                      
                                      publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                            
                                                                                                                    Paper No. 24                        
                                         UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                      
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                       
                                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                                         
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                     Ex parte KAZUYA KOBAYASHI,                                                                         
                                                TAKASHI YAMATE, and MOTOH ASAKURA                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                           Appeal No. 1999-0349                                                                         
                                                      Application No. 08/621,379                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                                                         HEARD: JANUARY 11, 2001                                                                        
                                                                   ____________                                                                         
                 Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and LEVY, Administrative Patent                                                                              
                 Judges.                                                                                                                                
                 LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                     


                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         
                          This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                                                                       
                 the examiner’s final rejection of claims 2-20 , which are all                    1                                                     
                 of the claims pending in this application.                                                                                             


                                                                   BACKGROUND                                                                           

                          1    Claims 5 and 15 were cancelled in an amendment filed under                                                               
                 37 CFR 1.116 (Paper No. 11B, filed April 23, 1998).  The amendment was entered                                                         
                 for purposes of appeal by the examiner in a subsequent advisory action (Paper                                                          
                 No. 12, mailed May 7, 1998).  Claims 2-4, 6-14, and 16-20 remain before us for                                                         
                 decision on appeal.                                                                                                                    





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007