Ex parte TANZI et al. - Page 6



                   Appeal No.  1999-0413                                                                                             
                   Application No.  08/294,819                                                                                       
                   concentrations would be effective to aggregate the alternatively labeled peptides.”                               
                   However, the examiner again fails to support her conclusion.                                                      
                           As set forth in In re Kotzab, 217 F.3d 1365, 1369-70, 55 USPQ2d 1313,                                     
                   1316 (Fed. Cir. 2000):                                                                                            
                           A critical step in analyzing the patentability of claims pursuant to                                      
                           section 103(a) is casting the mind back to the time of invention, to                                      
                           consider the thinking of one of ordinary skill in the art, guided only by                                 
                           the prior art references and the then-accepted wisdom in the field….                                      
                           Close adherence to this methodology is especially important in cases                                      
                           where the very ease with which the invention can be understood may                                        
                           prompt one Ato fall victim to the insidious effect of a hindsight                                         
                           syndrome wherein that which only the invention taught is used against                                     
                           its teacher.@ …                                                                                           

                           Most if not all inventions arise from a combination of old elements. …                                    
                           Thus, every element of a claimed invention may often be found in the                                      
                           prior art. … However, identification in the prior art of each individual                                  
                           part claimed is insufficient to defeat patentability of the whole claimed                                 
                           invention. … Rather, to establish obviousness based on a                                                  
                           combination of the elements disclosed in the prior art, there must be                                     
                           some motivation, suggestion or teaching of the desirability of making                                     
                           the specific combination that was made by the applicant.  [citations                                      
                           omitted]                                                                                                  
                   In other words, “there still must be evidence that ‘a skilled artisan, . . . with no                              
                   knowledge of the claimed invention, would select the elements from the cited prior                                
                   art references for combination in the manner claimed.’”  Ecolochem Inc. v. Southern                               
                   California Edison, 227 F.3d 1361, 1375, 56 USPQ2d 1065, 1075-76 (Fed. Cir.                                        
                   2000).                                                                                                            
                           For the reasons set forth above, we find no reasonable suggestion for                                     
                   combining the teachings of the references relied upon by the examiner in a manner                                 
                   which would have led one of ordinary skill in this art to arrive at the claimed                                   


                                                                 6                                                                   



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007