Ex parte TAKAHASHI et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of                 
          the Board.                                                                  
                                                            Paper No. 28              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                            Ex parte KATSUNORI TAKAHASHI                              
                                 and MASAHIDE TOMITA                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 1999-0440                                 
                               Application 08/813,706                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and DIXON, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claim 4, which constitutes                 
          the only claim remaining in the application.  Amendments after              
          final rejection were filed on February 13, 1998 and September               
          8, 1998. Both amendments were entered by the examiner.                      
          The disclosed invention pertains to a game computer                         

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007