Ex parte TAKAHASHI et al. - Page 8




          Appeal No. 1999-0440                                                        
          Application 08/813,706                                                      


          when no memories are required.  The only reason apparent to us              
          for modifying Ota in the manner proposed by the examiner is to              
          reconstruct appellants’ invention in hindsight.  Such                       
          hindsight reconstruction is improper.                                       






























                                          8                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007