Appeal No. 1999-0440 Application 08/813,706 when no memories are required. The only reason apparent to us for modifying Ota in the manner proposed by the examiner is to reconstruct appellants’ invention in hindsight. Such hindsight reconstruction is improper. 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007